
|
What is needed is a dialog with the other peoples and cultures of the world |
|
| |
Michael Wood |
|
Good fences make good neighbors. |
|
| Robert Frost | |
In 1992, Rodney King asked his famous question, “Why can't we all just
get along?” Asking that question has been much easier than answering it.
Through most of human history, in fact, societies have had to get along
with diversity and the challenges that accompany it. Some of the greatest
accomplishments in human history have resulted from the interaction of
different cultures; the same can be said of some of the greatest disasters.
“Getting along” with diversity continues to be a major and controversial
issue in the United States, even with the election of the first African-American
president. How are Americans, in an increasingly diverse world — and within
an increasingly diverse country — to define themselves and the society
in which they live? Is the current influx of foreign immigrants and cultures
into the United States a process that revitalizes the country, or is it
a threat to its basic core values?
This course attempts to address some of these issues. The central focus
is on how societies have defined their identities and dealt with the challenges
of ethnic or cultural diversity, culminating with the experiences of the
United States. While any number of cultures might be chosen for comparison,
the course this semester will examine four societies, each of which has
responded to the challenges of diversity in a different way. It will begin
with Japan, historically one of the most ethnically homogeneous communities
in the world. It might be said that the Japanese have dealt with diversity
by denying it, an option possible to them because of their unique island
location. The course will then look at traditional Islam and its dealings
with non-Muslims. Rather than imposing religious conformity on everyone,
early Muslims granted large populations of non-Muslims under their rule
special dhimmi or protected status, leaving them free to live their lives but effectively
marginalizing them from mainstream society. The Austro-Hungarian Empire,
a state inhabited by eleven major nationalities, is the third society to
be examined. The complex mix of nationalities in Austria-Hungary produced
a brilliant culture, but its inability to create a common identity led
to its disappearance from the European map in 1918. Finally, the course
will look at the role of diversity in the development of the United States.
While the United States has prided itself on being a “nation of immigrants”
tolerant of all groups, it has also seen itself as a “melting pot” in which
those groups were expected sooner or later to voluntarily relinquish most
of their distinctive features in a common “American” identity. That apparent
contradiction may underlie many of the controversies about multiculturalism
and ethnicity in the United States today.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES
At the end of the semester, the successful student will be able to:
| 1 | Describe how the selected societies or groups have defined their own identities and values; |
| 2 | Explain the general mechanisms with which those societies have accommodated divergent groups or value systems; |
| 3 | Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of multicultural societies; |
| 4 | Analyze the role of immigration and diversity in forming the character of the United States. |
| Aug. 23 Aug. 25 Aug. 27 |
Introduction Living with Diversity Discussion |
Amy Chua, Day of Empire Ayaan Hirshi Ali, “Clash of Civilizations” |
I. THE RISING SUN |
||
| Aug. 30 Sept. 1 Sept. |
The Making of Japan “The Electronic Tribe” Discussion |
Cathie Gandel, “Too Tall” Duus, 1-42 |
| Sept. 6 Sept. 8 Sept. 10 Sept. 10 |
First Encounters: The Momoyama Period Closed Door: The Tokugawa Bakufu ESSAY ON DUUS DUE Discussion |
Duus, 45-89 |
| Sept. 13 Sept. 15 Sept. 17 |
The Opening of Japan and the Meiji Restoration Contemporary Japan Discussion |
Duus, 117-133, 145-164, 179-183 Bonnet, “The Plus One Policy” Hayashi and Moffett, “Crack in the Door” Tabuchi, “Goodbye, Honored Guest” |
| Sept. 20 | FIRST TEST | |
II. THE STRAIGHT PATH |
||
| Sept. 22 Sept. 24 |
“The Roots of 9/11” Discussion |
|
| Sept. 27 Sept. 29 Oct. 1 |
The Rise of Muhammad Shari'a Discussion |
The Koran, The Cow |
| Oct. 4 Oct. 6 Oct. 8 |
The Muslim Empires Dhimmis and Jihads Discussion |
Masters, “Christians and Jews” |
| Oct. 11 Oct. 13 Oct. 15 |
Fundamentalist Islam SECOND TEST [Homecoming — no class] |
|
III. THE MULTINATIONAL EMPIRE |
||
| Oct. 18 Oct. 20 Oct. 22 |
The Origins of the Habsburg Monarchy Eleven Nationalities Discussion |
Mark Twain, “Stirring Times in Austria” |
| Oct. 25 Oct. 27 Oct. 29 |
The Politics of Nationality Fin de Siècle Vienna Discussion |
Albrecht, “Bohemian Question” |
| Nov. 1 Nov. 3 Nov. 5 |
The End of the Monarchy Eastern Europe Without the Habsburgs Discussion |
Fenyvesi, “When the World Was Whole” |
| Nov. 8 | THIRD TEST | |
IV. THE NATION OF IMMIGRANTS |
||
| Nov. 10 Nov. 12 |
Was There an American Melting Pot? Discussion |
A Bintel Brief, 7-36 |
| Nov. 15 Nov. 17 Nov. 19 Nov. 19 |
Worlds Left Behind The “New Immigration” ESSAY ON A BINTEL BRIEF DUE Discussion |
A Bintel Brief, 37-112 |
| Nov. 22 Nov. 24-26 |
“Island of Hope, Island of Dreams” [Thanksgiving vacation] |
|
| Nov. 29 Dec. 1 Dec. 3 |
Closing the Door Multicultural America Discussion |
Kennedy, “Still a Nation of Immigrants?” |
| Dec. 8 | FOURTH TEST (10:30-12:30) | |
